Origins Of The Term
The
roots of fundamentalism are found in the history of the
American millenarian movement. In the 1830s and '40s, much
excitement was generated in the United States by
expectations of the Second Advent of Christ and an ensuing
thousand years of peace ("the millennium"). 4
The
fundamentalist movement first received its name from a
twelve volume series entitled ‘The Fundamentals’ which began
publication in 1909. From this developed a list of five
basic fundamentals of the Christian religion which included:
1. The inspiration and infallibility of Scripture.
2. The deity of Christ (including His virgin birth).
3. The substitutionary atonement of Christ’s death.
4. The literal resurrection of Christ from the dead.
5. The literal return of Christ in the Second Advent.
Family Characteristics Of Fundamentalism
The
American Academy of Arts and Sciences funded a multiyear
project that brought scholars from around the world together
to study Fundamentalism. They produced 5 volumes containing
almost 8,000 pages of material. The last chapter of volume
1, Fundamentalisms Observed, discusses the "family
resemblances" found in the various chapters.
These
family resemblances include:
-
Religious idealism as basis for personal and communal
identity;
-
Fundamentalists understand truth to be revealed and
unified;
-
It
is intentionally scandalous;
-
Fundamentalists envision themselves as part of a cosmic
struggle;
-
They seize on historical moments and reinterpret them in
light of this cosmic struggle;
-
They demonize their opposition and are reactionary;
-
Fundamentalists are selective in what parts of their
tradition and heritage they stress;
-
They are led by males;
-
They envy modernist cultural hegemony and try to
overturn the distribution of power. 5
According to William O. Beeman four qualities of the
fundamentalist movements are: revivalism; orthodoxy;
evangelism; and social action. 6
Describing the basic characteristics of revivalist movements
Samuel Hungtington observes:
The movements for religious revival arc antisecular,
antiuniversal, and, except in their Christian
manifestations, anti-Western. They also arc opposed to the
relativism, egotism, and consumerism associated with what
Bruce B. Lawrence has termed "modernism" as distinct from
"modernity." By and large they do not reject urbanization,
industrialization, development, capitalism, science, and
technology, and what these imply for the organization of
society. 7
Modern use of the term
There are different terms used in the western media
islamists, extremists, terrorists, rdiclas, reformists
etc.The term fundamentalism is also used in a variety of
manner.
In Wikipedia the net encyclopedia it is stated:
The phrase
Islamic
fundamentalism is used in the West to describe
Islamist
groups many of which are opposed to
liberal movements
within Islam……It describes a variety of
religious movements and groups in
Muslim
communities which may be entirely apolitical. An example
is the
Tablighi Jamaat……It
describes Muslim groups which advocate
Islam as a political
movement, especially
Islamism,
which advocate the replacement of state secular laws
with
Islamic law.
8
Olivier Roy the author of The Failure of Political Islam,
states that “Islamism” is the brand of modern political
Islamic fundamentalism, which claims to recreate a true
Islamic society, not simply by imposing the Shariat, but by
establishing first an Islamic state through political
action. Islamists see Islam not as a mere religion, but as a
political ideology, which should be integrated into all
aspects of society (politics, law, economy, social justice,
foreign policy, etc.). The traditional idea of Islam as an
all-encompassing religion is extended to the complexity of a
modern society. In fact they acknowledge the modernity of
the society in terms of education, technology, changes in
family structure, and so forth. 9
Hungtington equates Islamic "fundamentalism with political
Islam:
'It is a broad intellectual, cultural, social, and
political movement prevalent throughout the Islamic
world. Islamic "fundamentalism," commonly conceived as
political Islam, is only one component in the much more
extensive revival of Islamic ideas, practices, and
rhetoric and the rededication to Islam by Muslim
populations.
The Resurgence is mainstream not extremist, pervasive
not isolated. 10
The
Rand corporation report by the title Civil democratic
Islam: Partners, Resources and Strategies distinguishes
two strands witin within fundamentalism: Scriptural
fundamentalists and radical fundamentalists. According to
the researcher
Scriptural
fundamentalism
is
grounded in theology and tends to have some roots in one or
another kind of religious establishment, On the Shi’a side,
this group includes most of the Iranian revolutionaries and,
as one Sunni manifestation, the Saudi-based Wahhabis.
The
radical fundamentalists
as the
report says are much less concerned with the literal
substance of Islam, with which they take considerable
liberties either deliberately or because of ignorance of
orthodox Islamic doctrine. They usuallydo not have any
“institutional” religious affiliations but tend to be
eclectic and
autodidactic in their knowledge of Islam. Al Qaeda, the
Afghan Taliban, Hizbut-Tahrir, and a large number of other
Islamic radical movements and diffuse groups worldwide
belong to this category. 11
There
is a great diversity among Muslim fundamentalist groups.
Mumtaz Ahmad notes that both Jamaat-i-Islami and Tablighi
Jamaat are fundamentalist movements in view of their
literalist interpretation of the Qur'an and the Sunna and in
view of their common hostility toward, and reaction against,
Islamic liberalism and their shared dedication to restore
pristine Islam. Although there is a vast difference between
there strategies as the Jamaat-i-Islami is dedicated to the
resacralization of political life and the establishment of
an Islamic state with the Qur'an and Sunna as its
constitution and the Shari'a as its basic law; the Tabligh
movement is dedicated to the moral and spiritual renewal of
individual believers, expected to fulfill their religious
obligations even in the absence of an Islamic state. 12
Choueiri
in his book Islamic fundamentalism mentioned that the direct
meaning of the term is assumed to indicate a certain
intellectual stance that claims to derive political
principles from a timeless, divine text. He stated that
three separate movements are identified and studied within
this convenient framework:
Revivalism, reformism and radicalism. 13
It
is my considered opinion that we consider fundamentalism as
the idea that it is not enough to practice Islam in the
personal life, but that the teachings of the Qur´an and
those of the Sunnah need also be implemented in their
totality in the social, economic, and political fields. In
other words, it implies the establishment of the sovereignty
of Almighty Allah (SWT) in the "religious" as well as the
"secular" domains, or the removal of the dichotomy between
collective life and state authority on the one hand and
Divine guidance on the other.
For
example according to a well-known contemporary scholar:
The essence of Islamic Revolutionary Thought consists of
the idea that it is not enough to practice Islam in the
personal life, but that the teachings of the Qur´an and
those of the Sunnah need also be implemented in their
totality in the social, economic, and political fields. In
other words, it implies the establishment of the soverignty
of Almighty Allah (SWT) in the "religious" as well as the
"secular" domains, or the removal of the dichotomy between
collective life and state authority on the one hand and
Divine guidance on the other.
14
Now
in our remaining paper we will use the term “Islamic
Fundamentalism” in a positive manner for the persons and
movements who seek to restore the original teachings of the
Qur'an and Sunna and to re-create the socioreligious system
established under the direct guidance of the Prophet and his
first four successors “the rightly guided caliphs”.
<<Previous Page
|
Back to Table of Contents |
Back to Top
| Next Page >> |